<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Karl Reinsch's Blog &#187; rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://karlreinsch.com/category/ai/rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://karlreinsch.com</link>
	<description>programming models, inference engines, AI, whatever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Rule Engine Survey</title>
		<link>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/06/01/microsoft-rule-engine-survey/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=microsoft-rule-engine-survey</link>
		<comments>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/06/01/microsoft-rule-engine-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl W. Reinsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BizTalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BizTalk BRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BizTalk Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft BRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Workflow Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlreinsch.com/?p=1326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you interested in helping to shape Microsoft&#8217;s future rules products? Microsoft is running a survey on rule engines in general, and its own rule products (WF Rules, MS BRE) in particular through the end of this week &#8211; June 4. (I would have blogged it yesterday, but was off due to holiday.) The survey [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/02/05/microsoft-rule-engines/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Microsoft&#8217;s Rule Engines'>Microsoft&#8217;s Rule Engines</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/11/have-you-implemented-backward-chaining-on-a-microsoft-rule-engine/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Have You Implemented Backward Chaining On A Microsoft Rule Engine?'>Have You Implemented Backward Chaining On A Microsoft Rule Engine?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/06/another-dormant-net-rule-engine-project-simple-rule-engine/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another Dormant .NET Rule Engine Project: Simple Rule Engine'>Another Dormant .NET Rule Engine Project: Simple Rule Engine</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/06/01/microsoft-rule-engine-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rules In WF4</title>
		<link>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/03/17/rules-in-wf4/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rules-in-wf4</link>
		<comments>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/03/17/rules-in-wf4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl W. Reinsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WF Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Workflow Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlreinsch.com/?p=1245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My blog stats show trending topics around searches for &#8220;wf4 rule engine&#8221; and &#8220;wf rule engine&#8221; and &#8220;wf rules&#8221; among other variations. If those topics are leading people to this blog, then I might as well address the topic directly. What Is WF? For those who don&#8217;t know what the queries above mean &#8211; it [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/02/05/microsoft-rule-engines/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Microsoft&#8217;s Rule Engines'>Microsoft&#8217;s Rule Engines</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/06/01/microsoft-rule-engine-survey/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Microsoft Rule Engine Survey'>Microsoft Rule Engine Survey</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/11/have-you-implemented-backward-chaining-on-a-microsoft-rule-engine/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Have You Implemented Backward Chaining On A Microsoft Rule Engine?'>Have You Implemented Backward Chaining On A Microsoft Rule Engine?</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/03/17/rules-in-wf4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using A Rule Engine For Hacking</title>
		<link>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/03/17/using-a-rule-engine-for-hacking/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=using-a-rule-engine-for-hacking</link>
		<comments>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/03/17/using-a-rule-engine-for-hacking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl W. Reinsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Forgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monkey and bananas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPS5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phrack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlreinsch.com/?p=1231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was interested to stumble upon an issue of the hacker zine Phrack dating back to 2000 which includes a tutorial on building a vulnerability scanning system used for hacking&#8230;that includes a rule engine. The article mentions a number of things you would expect: Rete, OPS5, CLIPS, Charles Forgy, Daniel Miranker and even the monkey [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2008/10/31/monkey-and-bananas-2-the-revenge/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Monkey and Bananas 2: The Revenge'>Monkey and Bananas 2: The Revenge</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/06/another-dormant-net-rule-engine-project-simple-rule-engine/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another Dormant .NET Rule Engine Project: Simple Rule Engine'>Another Dormant .NET Rule Engine Project: Simple Rule Engine</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/who-said-it-any-backward-chaining-engine-must-eventually/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Who Said It? &#8220;any backward chaining engine must eventually&#8230;&#8221;'>Who Said It? &#8220;any backward chaining engine must eventually&#8230;&#8221;</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/03/17/using-a-rule-engine-for-hacking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Rule Engines</title>
		<link>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/02/05/microsoft-rule-engines/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=microsoft-rule-engines</link>
		<comments>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/02/05/microsoft-rule-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl W. Reinsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BizTalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BizTalk BRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BizTalk Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward chaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Solver Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mono Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS BRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negation-as-failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rete algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StreamInsight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cult of rete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WF Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Workflow Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlreinsch.com/?p=803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am often asked to describe the rule engines that Microsoft ships. (The first question being: &#8220;Microsoft has rule engines?&#8221;) This question frequently comes from folks who know rules, but don&#8217;t know .NET. This post is specifically written to answer the question. Should the offerings change in the future, I will update this post as [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/06/01/microsoft-rule-engine-survey/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Microsoft Rule Engine Survey'>Microsoft Rule Engine Survey</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/11/have-you-implemented-backward-chaining-on-a-microsoft-rule-engine/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Have You Implemented Backward Chaining On A Microsoft Rule Engine?'>Have You Implemented Backward Chaining On A Microsoft Rule Engine?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2009/05/03/biztalk-server-2009-released/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BizTalk Server 2009 Released'>BizTalk Server 2009 Released</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/02/05/microsoft-rule-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October Rules Fest 2009 &amp; 2010</title>
		<link>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/02/03/october-rules-fest-2009-2010/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=october-rules-fest-2009-2010</link>
		<comments>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/02/03/october-rules-fest-2009-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl W. Reinsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October Rules Fest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlreinsch.com/?p=1120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheers to James Owen for his stewardship of the October Rules Fest for 2008 and 2009. I was only able to attend a small portion of the 2009 conference, but those portions were quite good. The sign of a healthy conference is one where attendees return as presenters and this year had a few such [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2008/11/17/october-rules-fest-providing-feedback/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: October Rules Fest: Providing Feedback'>October Rules Fest: Providing Feedback</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2008/11/03/october-rules-fest-moving-forward/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: October Rules Fest: Moving Forward'>October Rules Fest: Moving Forward</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2008/11/04/october-rules-fest-day-1/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: October Rules Fest: Day 1'>October Rules Fest: Day 1</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/02/03/october-rules-fest-2009-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have You Implemented Backward Chaining On A Microsoft Rule Engine?</title>
		<link>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/11/have-you-implemented-backward-chaining-on-a-microsoft-rule-engine/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=have-you-implemented-backward-chaining-on-a-microsoft-rule-engine</link>
		<comments>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/11/have-you-implemented-backward-chaining-on-a-microsoft-rule-engine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl W. Reinsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backward chaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BizTalk BRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WF Rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlreinsch.com/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often I hear about a &#8220;friend of a friend&#8221; who has implemented a backward chaining project with one of the Microsoft rule engines (WF Rules, BizTalk MS BRE). However, the details usually fail to materialize. If you have worked on such a system, or know someone who has &#8211; please contact me using [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/who-said-it-any-backward-chaining-engine-must-eventually/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Who Said It? &#8220;any backward chaining engine must eventually&#8230;&#8221;'>Who Said It? &#8220;any backward chaining engine must eventually&#8230;&#8221;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/06/01/microsoft-rule-engine-survey/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Microsoft Rule Engine Survey'>Microsoft Rule Engine Survey</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/02/05/microsoft-rule-engines/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Microsoft&#8217;s Rule Engines'>Microsoft&#8217;s Rule Engines</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/11/have-you-implemented-backward-chaining-on-a-microsoft-rule-engine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Chaining</title>
		<link>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/on-chaining/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=on-chaining</link>
		<comments>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/on-chaining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl W. Reinsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backward chaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Forgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Isaac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward chaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RulesPower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlreinsch.com/?p=878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the recurring topics in the rules world is forward chaining vs. backward chaining &#8211; how they compare, when to use one or the other, and which implementations even offer back chaining. I suspect that a lot of the confusion around backward chaining is simply due to the fact that most folks haven&#8217;t implemented [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/who-said-it-any-backward-chaining-engine-must-eventually/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Who Said It? &#8220;any backward chaining engine must eventually&#8230;&#8221;'>Who Said It? &#8220;any backward chaining engine must eventually&#8230;&#8221;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/11/have-you-implemented-backward-chaining-on-a-microsoft-rule-engine/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Have You Implemented Backward Chaining On A Microsoft Rule Engine?'>Have You Implemented Backward Chaining On A Microsoft Rule Engine?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/03/17/using-a-rule-engine-for-hacking/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Using A Rule Engine For Hacking'>Using A Rule Engine For Hacking</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/on-chaining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Said It? &#8220;any backward chaining engine must eventually&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/who-said-it-any-backward-chaining-engine-must-eventually/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=who-said-it-any-backward-chaining-engine-must-eventually</link>
		<comments>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/who-said-it-any-backward-chaining-engine-must-eventually/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl W. Reinsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backward chaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward chaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlreinsch.com/?p=883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a quote that James Owen used on the JESS mailing list and I&#8217;m interested in learning where it comes from. More specifically, is it in a paper or article somewhere and I&#8217;m just overlooking it? My suspicion is that James is quoting Dr. Charles Forgy and that it isn&#8217;t published in any articles. [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/11/have-you-implemented-backward-chaining-on-a-microsoft-rule-engine/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Have You Implemented Backward Chaining On A Microsoft Rule Engine?'>Have You Implemented Backward Chaining On A Microsoft Rule Engine?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/on-chaining/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: On Chaining'>On Chaining</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/03/17/using-a-rule-engine-for-hacking/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Using A Rule Engine For Hacking'>Using A Rule Engine For Hacking</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/who-said-it-any-backward-chaining-engine-must-eventually/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rules Research Archaeology</title>
		<link>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/rules-research-archaeology/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rules-research-archaeology</link>
		<comments>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/rules-research-archaeology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl W. Reinsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archaeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backward chaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward chaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multicore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallelism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlreinsch.com/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most readers should be familiar with George Santayana&#8216;s quote about remembering the past (also called Santayana&#8217;s Law of Repetitive Consequences). The rise of the BRMS over the last few years has brought lots of enthusiastic new members to our little rules world. These people are eager to contribute to the field and make their own [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/on-chaining/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: On Chaining'>On Chaining</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2008/11/12/october-rules-fest-day-2/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: October Rules Fest: Day 2'>October Rules Fest: Day 2</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2008/11/14/october-rules-fest-day-3/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: October Rules Fest: Day 3'>October Rules Fest: Day 3</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/rules-research-archaeology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another .NET Rete Implementation &#8211; NRuler</title>
		<link>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/another-net-rete-implementation-nruler/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=another-net-rete-implementation-nruler</link>
		<comments>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/another-net-rete-implementation-nruler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl W. Reinsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRuler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NxBRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simple Rule Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlreinsch.com/?p=860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just spotted another .NET implementation of Rete &#8211; NRuler. The site shows only 10 downloads, but it seems to have been live less than a month so far. Any of the 10 downloaders care to share their impressions? How does it compare with NxBRE or SRE? (As an aside, I spotted NRuler because it [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/06/another-dormant-net-rule-engine-project-simple-rule-engine/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another Dormant .NET Rule Engine Project: Simple Rule Engine'>Another Dormant .NET Rule Engine Project: Simple Rule Engine</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2009/05/03/biztalk-server-2009-released/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BizTalk Server 2009 Released'>BizTalk Server 2009 Released</a></li>
<li><a href='http://karlreinsch.com/2010/06/01/microsoft-rule-engine-survey/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Microsoft Rule Engine Survey'>Microsoft Rule Engine Survey</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://karlreinsch.com/2010/01/07/another-net-rete-implementation-nruler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
